<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<document>
<title>Ununoctium</title>
<authors>Wikipedia</authors>
<publisher>wikipedia.org</publisher>
<publishedplace>network</publishedplace>
<publishedyear>2010</publishedyear>
<edition></edition>
<category>Synthetic elements</category>
<section id="11694" fatherid="0" title="" lv="" priority="-1" level="1">
Ununoctium ( ), also known as eka-radon or element 118, is the temporary IUPAC name for the transactinide element having the atomic number 118 and temporary element symbol Uuo. On the periodic table of the elements, it is a p-block element and the last one of the 7th period. Ununoctium is currently the only synthetic member of Group 18. It has the highest atomic number and highest atomic mass of all discovered elements.
The radioactive ununoctium atom is very unstable, and since 2002, only three atoms (possibly four) of the isotope  have been detected. While this allowed for very little experimental characterization of its properties and possible compounds, theoretical calculations have allowed for many predictions, including some very unexpected ones. For example, although ununoctium is a member of Group 18, it is probably not a noble gas, as are all the other Group 18 elements. It was formerly thought to be a gas but is now predicted to be a solid under normal conditions.

</section>
<section id="11695" fatherid="0" title="History" lv="" priority="-2" level="1">
<section id="11696" fatherid="11695" title="Unsuccessful attempts" lv="" priority="-1" level="2">
In late 1998, Polish physicist Robert Smolańczuk published calculations on the fusion of atomic nuclei towards the synthesis of superheavy atoms, including element 118. His calculations suggested that it might be possible to make element 118 by fusing lead with krypton under carefully controlled conditions.
In 1999, researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory made use of these predictions and announced the discovery of elements 116 and 118, in a paper published in Physical Review Letters, and very soon after the results were reported in Science. The researchers claimed to have performed the reaction
 +  →  + .
The following year, they published a retraction after researchers at other laboratories were unable to duplicate the results and the Berkeley lab itself was unable to duplicate them as well. In June 2002, the director of the lab announced that the original claim of the discovery of these two elements had been based on data fabricated by principal author Victor Ninov.

</section>
<section id="11697" fatherid="11695" title="Discovery" lv="" priority="-2" level="2">
First decay of atoms of ununoctium was observed at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) in Dubna, Russia, in 2002. On October 9, 2006, researchers from JINR and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory of California, USA, working at the JINR in Dubna, announced that they had indirectly detected a total of three (possibly four) nuclei of ununoctium-294 (one or two in 2002 and two more in 2005) produced via collisions of californium-249 atoms and calcium-48 ions:
 +  →  + 3 .
Because of the very small fusion reaction probability (the fusion cross section is ~0.3–0.6 pb = (3–6)×10−41 m2) the experiment took 4 months and involved a beam dose of 4×1019 calcium ions that had to be shot at the californium target to produce the first recorded event believed to be the synthesis of ununoctium. Nevertheless, researchers are highly confident that the results are not a false positive, since the chance that the detections were random events was estimated to be less than one part in 100,000.
In the experiments, the alpha-decay of three atoms of ununoctium was observed. A fourth decay by direct spontaneous fission was also proposed. A half-life of 0.89 ms was calculated:  decays into  by alpha decay. Since there were only three nuclei, the half-life derived from observed lifetimes has a large uncertainty: 0.89 ms.
 →  + 
The identification of the  nuclei was verified by separately creating the putative daughter nucleus  by means of a bombardment of  with  ions,
 +  →  + 3 ,
and checking that the  decay matched the decay chain of the  nuclei. The daughter nucleus  is very unstable, decaying with a half-life of 14 milliseconds into . The latter may experience either spontaneous fission or alpha decay into , which will undergo spontaneous fission.
In a quantum-tunneling model, the alpha decay half-life of 294118 was predicted to be 0.66 ms with the experimental Q-value published in 2004. Calculation with theoretical Q-values from the macroscopic-microscopic model of Muntian–Hofman–Patyk–Sobiczewski gives somewhat low but comparable results.
Following the success in obtaining ununoctium, the discoverers have started similar experiments in the hope of creating element 120 from  and .
Isotopes of the element 120 are predicted to have alpha decay half lives of the order of micro-seconds.

</section>
</section>
<section id="11698" fatherid="0" title="Naming" lv="" priority="-3" level="1">
Until the 1960s ununoctium was known as eka-emanation (emanation is the old name for radon). In 1979 the IUPAC published recommendations according to which the element was to be called ununoctium, a systematic element name, as a placeholder until the discovery of the element is confirmed and the IUPAC decides on a name.
Before the retraction in 2002, the researchers from Berkeley had intended to name the element ghiorsium (Gh), after Albert Ghiorso (a leading member of the research team).
The Russian discoverers reported their synthesis in 2006. In 2007, the head of the Russian institute stated the team were considering two names for the new element: Flyorium in honor of Georgy Flyorov, the founder of the research laboratory in Dubna; and moskovium, in recognition of the Moskovskaya Oblast where Dubna is located. He also stated that although the element was discovered as an American collaboration, who provided the californium target, the element should ly be named in honor of Russia since the Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions at JINR was the only facility in the world which could achieve this result.

</section>
<section id="11699" fatherid="0" title="Characteristics" lv="" priority="-4" level="1">
<section id="11700" fatherid="11699" title="Nucleus stability and isotopes" lv="" priority="1" level="2">
There are no elements with an atomic number above 82 (after lead) that have stable isotopes. The stability of nuclei decreases with the increase in atomic number, such that all isotopes with an atomic number above 101 decay radioactively with a half-life under a day. Nevertheless, because of reasons not very well understood yet, there is a slight increased nuclear stability around elements 110–114, which leads to the appearance of what is known in nuclear physics as the "island of stability". This concept, proposed by UC Berkeley professor Glenn Seaborg, explains why superheavy elements last longer than predicted. Ununoctium is radioactive and has half-life that appears to be less than a millisecond. Nonetheless, this is still longer than some predicted values, thus giving further support to the idea of this "island of stability".
Calculations using a quantum-tunneling model predict the existence of several neutron-rich isotopes of element 118 with alpha-decay half-lives close to 1 ms.
Theoretical calculations done on the synthetic pathways for, and the half-life of, other isotopes have shown that some could be slightly more stable than the synthesized isotope , most likely , , , , ,  and . Of these,  might provide the best chances for obtaining longer-lived nuclei, and thus might become the focus of future work with this element. Some isotopes with many more neutrons, such as some located around , could also provide longer-lived nuclei.

</section>
<section id="11701" fatherid="11699" title="Calculated atomic and physical properties" lv="" priority="2" level="2">
Ununoctium is a member of group 18, the zero-valence elements. The members of this group are usually inert to most common chemical reactions (for example, combustion) because the outer valence shell is completely filled with eight electrons. This produces a stable, minimum energy configuration in which the outer electrons are tightly bound. It is thought that similarly, ununoctium has a closed outer valence shell in which its valence electrons are arranged in a 7s2, 7p6 configuration.
Consequently, some expect ununoctium to have similar physical and chemical properties to other members of its group, most closely resembling the noble gas above it in the periodic table, radon.
Following the periodic trend, ununoctium would be expected to be slightly more reactive than radon. However, theoretical calculations have shown that it could be quite reactive, so that it can probably not be considered a noble gas. In addition to being far more reactive than radon, ununoctium may be even more reactive than elements 114 and 112. The reason for the apparent enhancement of the chemical activity of element 118 relative to radon is an energetic destabilization and a radial expansion of the last occupied 7p subshell.the actual quote is: "The reason for the apparent enhancement of chemical activity of element 118 relative to radon is the energetic destabilization and radial expansion of its occupied 7p3/2 spinor shell" More precisely, considerable spin-orbit interactions between the 7p electrons with the inert 7s2 electrons, effectively lead to a second valence shell closing at element 114, and a significant decrease in stabilization of the closed shell of element 118. It has also been calculated that ununoctium, unlike other noble gases, binds an electron with release of energy—or in other words, it exhibits positive electron affinity.Nevertheless, quantum electrodynamic corrections have been shown to be quite significant in reducing this affinity (by decreasing the binding in the anion Uuo− by 9%) thus confirming the importance of these corrections in superheavy atoms. See Pyykko
Ununoctium is expected to have by far the broadest polarizability of all elements before it in the periodic table, and almost twofold of radon. By extrapolating from the other noble gases, it is expected that ununoctium has a boiling point between 320 and 380 K. This is very different from the previously estimated values of 263 K or 247 K. Even given the large uncertainties of the calculations, it seems highly unlikely that element 118 would be a gas under standard conditions.It is debatable if the name of the group 'noble gases' will be changed if ununoctium is shown to be non-volatile. And as the liquid range of the other gases is very narrow, between 2 and 9 kelvins, this element should be solid at standard conditions. If ununoctium forms a gas under standard conditions nevertheless, it would be one of the densest gaseous substances at standard conditions (even if it is monatomic like the other noble gases).
Because of its tremendous polarizability, ununoctium is expected to have an anomalously low ionization energy (similar to that of lead which is 70% of that of radon and significantly smaller than that of element 114) and a standard state condensed phase.

</section>
<section id="11702" fatherid="11699" title="Predicted compounds" lv="" priority="3" level="2">
No compounds of ununoctium have been synthesized yet, but calculations on theoretical compounds have been performed since 1964. It is expected that if the ionization energy of the element is high enough, it will be difficult to oxidize and therefore, the most common oxidation state will be 0 (as for other noble gases).
Calculations on the dimeric molecule  showed a bonding interaction roughly equivalent to that calculated for , and a dissociation energy of 6 kJ/mol, roughly 4 times of that of . But most strikingly, it was calculated to have a bond length shorter than in  by 0.16 Å, which would be indicative of a significant bonding interaction. On the other hand, the compound UuoH+ exhibits a dissociation energy (in other words proton affinity of Uuo) that is smaller than that of RnH+.
The bonding between ununoctium and hydrogen in UuoH is very limp and can be regarded as a pure van der Waals interaction rather than a true chemical bond. On the other hand, with highly electronegative elements, ununoctium seems to form more stable compounds than for example element 112 or element 114. The stable oxidation states +2 and +4 have been predicted to exist in the fluorinated compounds  and . This is a result of the same spin-orbit interactions that make ununoctium unusually reactive. For example, it was shown that the reaction of Uuo with  to form the compound , would release an energy of 106 kcal/mol of which about 46 kcal/mol come from these interactions. For comparison, the spin-orbit interaction for the similar molecule  is about 10 kcal/mol out of a formation energy of 49 kcal/mol. The same interaction stabilizes the tetrahedral Td configuration for , as distinct from the square planar D4h one of  and . The Uuo–F bond will most probably be ionic rather than covalent, rendering the UuoFn compounds non-volatile. Unlike the other noble gases, ununoctium was predicted to be sufficiently electropositive to form a Uuo–Cl bond with chlorine.
Since no more than four atoms of ununoctium have ever been produced, it currently has no uses outside of basic scientific research. It would constitute a radiation hazard if enough were ever assembled in one place.

</section>
</section>
<section id="11703" fatherid="0" title="See also" lv="" priority="-5" level="1">
</section>
<section id="11704" fatherid="0" title="References" lv="" priority="-6" level="1">
</section>
<section id="11705" fatherid="0" title="External links" lv="" priority="-7" level="1">
Category:Chemical elements
Category:Noble gases
Category:Synthetic elements
Category:Nuclear physics
Category:Ununoctium


lij:Ununoctio
stq:Ununoctium

</section>
</document>
